<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday Tossup &#8211; Take Two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/2009/tuesday-tossup-take-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/2009/tuesday-tossup-take-two/</link>
	<description>Hide your redheads!!!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:35:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: firefly4f4</title>
		<link>http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/2009/tuesday-tossup-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1495</link>
		<dc:creator>firefly4f4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/?p=26#comment-1495</guid>
		<description>*18-6* for a possible Serra opponent... oops</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*18-6* for a possible Serra opponent&#8230; oops</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firefly4f4</title>
		<link>http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/2009/tuesday-tossup-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1494</link>
		<dc:creator>firefly4f4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/?p=26#comment-1494</guid>
		<description>So, of the fighter&#039;s BJ&#039;s fought that have --lost-- in in 2009 (not including fights after this was posted):
Sherk          34-4      68-4 or *17-4*
Stevenson   30-10     60-10 or 15-10
Pulver         22-12   44-12 or 11-12
Gomi           30-5      60-5 or *15-5*
Serra           9-6       *18-5*

Of those, I&#039;d say Sherk, Gomi, and Serra are the likely candidates for one of them.  These are all guys I&#039;ve considered before, though, and damned if I can find anyone with the highlighted records.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, of the fighter&#8217;s BJ&#8217;s fought that have &#8211;lost&#8211; in in 2009 (not including fights after this was posted):<br />
Sherk          34-4      68-4 or *17-4*<br />
Stevenson   30-10     60-10 or 15-10<br />
Pulver         22-12   44-12 or 11-12<br />
Gomi           30-5      60-5 or *15-5*<br />
Serra           9-6       *18-5*</p>
<p>Of those, I&#8217;d say Sherk, Gomi, and Serra are the likely candidates for one of them.  These are all guys I&#8217;ve considered before, though, and damned if I can find anyone with the highlighted records.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evil pooh</title>
		<link>http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/2009/tuesday-tossup-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1493</link>
		<dc:creator>evil pooh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/?p=26#comment-1493</guid>
		<description>No one has guessed right yet.

Here are a few random things.  Let me know which gives it away...

Both fighters are *NOW* in the same weight class.

One of the fighters has lost their last *TWO* in a row.

Neither fighter is BJ, but he *IS* a part of one of the fighters records.  (huge hint)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one has guessed right yet.</p>
<p>Here are a few random things.  Let me know which gives it away&#8230;</p>
<p>Both fighters are *NOW* in the same weight class.</p>
<p>One of the fighters has lost their last *TWO* in a row.</p>
<p>Neither fighter is BJ, but he *IS* a part of one of the fighters records.  (huge hint)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firefly4f4</title>
		<link>http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/2009/tuesday-tossup-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1492</link>
		<dc:creator>firefly4f4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/?p=26#comment-1492</guid>
		<description>Arg... OK, I&#039;m stumped.   The last one was actually somewhat easy as the &quot;same winning percentage, but 10% more wins&quot; meant that both were likely undefeated fighters, and probably 11 vs 10 fights.

This one, every time I think of someone I can&#039;t for the life of me find someone I can&#039;t think/find anyone who matches the other criteria.  I mean, I immediately started thinking of BJ for fighter B (who can&#039;t have THAT many wins), but I can&#039;t think of anyone who&#039;s 26-5.

Any time I think of someone who&#039;s maybe lost once (ie, Brock), said loss has never been this year.  Leites might also be a good one, but I&#039;m not sure who&#039;s 7-2 (or 28-2) and also lost this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arg&#8230; OK, I&#8217;m stumped.   The last one was actually somewhat easy as the &#8220;same winning percentage, but 10% more wins&#8221; meant that both were likely undefeated fighters, and probably 11 vs 10 fights.</p>
<p>This one, every time I think of someone I can&#8217;t for the life of me find someone I can&#8217;t think/find anyone who matches the other criteria.  I mean, I immediately started thinking of BJ for fighter B (who can&#8217;t have THAT many wins), but I can&#8217;t think of anyone who&#8217;s 26-5.</p>
<p>Any time I think of someone who&#8217;s maybe lost once (ie, Brock), said loss has never been this year.  Leites might also be a good one, but I&#8217;m not sure who&#8217;s 7-2 (or 28-2) and also lost this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evil pooh</title>
		<link>http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/2009/tuesday-tossup-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1491</link>
		<dc:creator>evil pooh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/?p=26#comment-1491</guid>
		<description>Yup, it is *EXACTLY* twice as many wins.  However, it is over 100 point difference in currently listed strength of schedule.  *EXACT* same number of loses as well.

I thought about including &quot;victorious&quot; strength of schedule, but I don&#039;t currently show that on the site.  Hrmmm...maybe I should add that to the site anyway.  Something like:

Fighter A  -  Strength of Schedule YYY
                  Strength of Opponents actually *BEAT*  ZZZ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, it is *EXACTLY* twice as many wins.  However, it is over 100 point difference in currently listed strength of schedule.  *EXACT* same number of loses as well.</p>
<p>I thought about including &#8220;victorious&#8221; strength of schedule, but I don&#8217;t currently show that on the site.  Hrmmm&#8230;maybe I should add that to the site anyway.  Something like:</p>
<p>Fighter A  &#8211;  Strength of Schedule YYY<br />
                  Strength of Opponents actually *BEAT*  ZZZ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firefly4f4</title>
		<link>http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/2009/tuesday-tossup-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1490</link>
		<dc:creator>firefly4f4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/?p=26#comment-1490</guid>
		<description>Is it *exactly* twice as many wins for fighter A?  I&#039;m assuming so, otherwise you probably would have said &quot;over twice as many&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it *exactly* twice as many wins for fighter A?  I&#8217;m assuming so, otherwise you probably would have said &#8220;over twice as many&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evil pooh</title>
		<link>http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/2009/tuesday-tossup-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1489</link>
		<dc:creator>evil pooh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/?p=26#comment-1489</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re ok unless you catch yourself humming it at the can.  8P

The verse gets a little off, but it comes back before the refrain.  I think it hinges on how you handle E-LOW, E- EL - OH, etc.  *shrugs*

Either way, who ya got?  How much does 100 or even 200 points of &quot;strength of schedule&quot; actually buy you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re ok unless you catch yourself humming it at the can.  8P</p>
<p>The verse gets a little off, but it comes back before the refrain.  I think it hinges on how you handle E-LOW, E- EL &#8211; OH, etc.  *shrugs*</p>
<p>Either way, who ya got?  How much does 100 or even 200 points of &#8220;strength of schedule&#8221; actually buy you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geedub</title>
		<link>http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/2009/tuesday-tossup-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1488</link>
		<dc:creator>geedub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/?p=26#comment-1488</guid>
		<description>Should I be concerned that I clicked the youtube link and sang the new mma-elo theme song just to see how well it all worked?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should I be concerned that I clicked the youtube link and sang the new mma-elo theme song just to see how well it all worked?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

