Comments on: Strike Force Carano Vs Cyborg Update http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/2009/strike-force-carano-vs-cyborg-update/ Hide your redheads!!! Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:35:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 By: Asurah http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/2009/strike-force-carano-vs-cyborg-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1534 Asurah Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:17:30 +0000 http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/?p=35#comment-1534 Excellent rant, as usual The entire thing is spot on, especially the bit about some of the recent comments regarding "bias" (I've read/dealt with such arguments even a day or so ago on that very thing) Keep them coming, great read as always Excellent rant, as usual

The entire thing is spot on, especially the bit about some of the recent
comments regarding “bias” (I’ve read/dealt with such arguments even
a day or so ago on that very thing)

Keep them coming, great read as always

]]> By: geedub http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/2009/strike-force-carano-vs-cyborg-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1533 geedub Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:23:16 +0000 http://www.mma-elo.com/rants/?p=35#comment-1533 Another solid rant from the evil one!! Its refreshing to be able to come to this site and read stuff that is logical and just makes sense. Especially enjoyed your red paint / white paint reference to bias. So many times people seems to describe any kind of conclusion you reach as stemming from some form of bias. You know...... I say: "I think Aoki should be ranked at #1 because of fact 1, fact 2, fact 3......." Buffoon says (ignoring the validity of the facts presented): "Its clear you are biased towards Aoki. BJ would destroy him!" Uh, if I think 1+1 = 2 does that mean Im biased towards 2? Does it mean Im a 3 hater? No. Its a simple conclusion Ive come to based on information and reason. Bias!! pppfffftt! Oh, and back to Aoki. This site used to be great before Aoki lost to Mach. Then, for a few months, I dunno what happened. All your biased technical rubbish took hold and fucked things up.......Aoki lost his spot. Thankfully, not long ago.......coincidentally just after Aoki beat Shaolin, you corrected the errors in your special formulas and put Aoki back to his rightful place atop the LW rankings. Please continue to tweak your formulas to ensure he stays there!! :P Another solid rant from the evil one!! Its refreshing to be able to come to this site and read stuff that is logical and just makes sense. Especially enjoyed your red paint / white paint reference to bias. So many times people seems to describe any kind of conclusion you reach as stemming from some form of bias. You know……

I say: “I think Aoki should be ranked at #1 because of fact 1, fact 2, fact 3…….”
Buffoon says (ignoring the validity of the facts presented): “Its clear you are biased towards Aoki. BJ would destroy him!”

Uh, if I think 1+1 = 2 does that mean Im biased towards 2? Does it mean Im a 3 hater? No. Its a simple conclusion Ive come to based on information and reason. Bias!! pppfffftt!

Oh, and back to Aoki. This site used to be great before Aoki lost to Mach. Then, for a few months, I dunno what happened. All your biased technical rubbish took hold and fucked things up…….Aoki lost his spot. Thankfully, not long ago…….coincidentally just after Aoki beat Shaolin, you corrected the errors in your special formulas and put Aoki back to his rightful place atop the LW rankings. Please continue to tweak your formulas to ensure he stays there!! :P

]]>